svcadm(8)을 검색하려면 섹션에서 8 을 선택하고, 맨 페이지 이름에 svcadm을 입력하고 검색을 누른다.
FSS(4)
FSS(4) Device and Network Interfaces FSS(4)
NAME
FSS - Fair share scheduler
DESCRIPTION
The fair share scheduler (FSS) guarantees application performance by
explicitly allocating shares of CPU resources to projects. A share in‐
dicates a project's entitlement to available CPU resources. Because
shares are meaningful only in comparison with other project's shares,
the absolute quantity of shares is not important. Any number that is in
proportion with the desired CPU entitlement can be used.
The goals of the FSS scheduler differ from the traditional time-sharing
scheduling class (TS). In addition to scheduling individual LWPs, the
FSS scheduler schedules projects against each other, making it impossi‐
ble for any project to acquire more CPU cycles simply by running more
processes concurrently.
A project's entitlement is individually calculated by FSS independently
for each processor set if the project contains processes bound to them.
If a project is running on more than one processor set, it can have
different entitlements on every set. A project's entitlement is defined
as a ratio between the number of shares given to a project and the sum
of shares of all active projects running on the same processor set. An
active project is one that has at least one running or runnable
process. Entitlements are recomputed whenever any project becomes ac‐
tive or inactive, or whenever the number of shares is changed.
Processor sets represent virtual machines in the FSS scheduling class
and processes are scheduled independently in each processor set. That
is, processes compete with each other only if they are running on the
same processor set. When a processor set is destroyed, all processes
that were bound to it are moved to the default processor set, which al‐
ways exists. Empty processor sets (that is, sets without processors in
them) have no impact on the FSS scheduler behavior.
If a processor set contains a mix of TS/IA and FSS processes, the fair‐
ness of the FSS scheduling class can be compromised because these
classes use the same range of priorities. Fairness is most signifi‐
cantly affected if processes running in the TS scheduling class are
CPU-intensive and are bound to processors within the processor set. As
a result, you should avoid having processes from TS/IA and FSS classes
share the same processor set. RT and FSS processes use disjoint prior‐
ity ranges and therefore can share processor sets.
As projects execute, their CPU usage is accumulated over time. The FSS
scheduler periodically decays CPU usages of every project by multiply‐
ing it with a decay factor, ensuring that more recent CPU usage has
greater weight when taken into account for scheduling. The FSS sched‐
uler continually adjusts priorities of all processes to make each
project's relative CPU usage converge with its entitlement.
While FSS is designed to fairly allocate cycles over a long-term time
period, it is possible that projects will not receive their allocated
shares worth of CPU cycles due to uneven demand. This makes one-shot,
instantaneous analysis of FSS performance data unreliable.
Note that share is not the same as utilization. A project may be allo‐
cated 50% of the system, although on the average, it uses just 20%.
Shares serve to cap a project's CPU usage only when there is competi‐
tion from other projects running on the same processor set. When there
is no competition, utilization may be larger than entitlement based on
shares. Allocating a small share to a busy project slows it down but
does not prevent it from completing its work if the system is not satu‐
rated.
The configuration of CPU shares is managed by the name server as a
property of the project(5) database. In the following example, an entry
in the /etc/project file sets the number of shares for project x-files
to 10:
x-files:100::::project.cpu-shares=(privileged,10,none)
Projects with undefined number of shares are given one share each. This
means that such projects are treated with equal importance. Projects
with 0 shares only run when there are no projects with non-zero shares
competing for the same processor set. The maximum number of shares that
can be assigned to one project is 65535.
You can use the prctl(1) command to determine the current share assign‐
ment for a given project:
$ prctl -n project.cpu-shares -i project x-files
or to change the amount of shares if you have root privileges:
# prctl -r -n project.cpu-shares -v 5 -i project x-files
See the prctl(1) man page for additional information on how to modify
and examine resource controls associated with active processes, tasks,
or projects on the system. See resource-controls(7) for a description
of the resource controls supported in the current release of the So‐
laris operating system.
By default, project system (project ID 0) includes all system daemons
started by initialization scripts and has an "unlimited" amount of
shares. That is, it is always scheduled first no matter how many shares
are given to other projects.
The following command sets FSS as the default scheduler for the system:
# dispadmin -d FSS
This change will take effect on the next reboot. Alternatively, you can
move processes from the time-share scheduling class (as well as the
special case of init) into the FSS class without changing your default
scheduling class and rebooting by becoming root, and then using the
priocntl(1) command, as shown in the following example:
# priocntl -s -c FSS -i class TS
# priocntl -s -c FSS -i pid 1
CONFIGURING THE SCHEDULER WITH DISPADMIN
You can use the dispadmin(8) command to examine and tune the FSS sched‐
uler's time quantum value. The time quantum is the amount of time that
a thread is allowed to run before it must relinquish the processor. The
following example dumps the current time quantum for the fair share
scheduler:
$ dispadmin -g -c FSS
#
# Fair Share Scheduler Configuration
#
RES=1000
#
# Time Quantum
#
QUANTUM=110
The value of the QUANTUM represents some fraction of a second with the
fractional value determined by the reciprocal value of RES. With the
default value of RES=1000, the reciprocal of 1000 is .001, or millisec‐
onds. Thus, by default, the QUANTUM value represents the time quantum
in milliseconds.
If you change the RES value using dispadmin with the -r option, you
also change the QUANTUM value. For example, instead of quantum of 110
with RES of 1000, a quantum of 11 with a RES of 100 results. The frac‐
tional unit is different while the amount of time is the same.
You can use the -s option to change the time quantum value. Note that
such changes are not preserved across reboot. Please refer to the dis‐
padmin(8) man page for additional information.
ATTRIBUTES
See attributes(7) for descriptions of the following attributes:
tab() box; cw(2.75i) |cw(2.75i) lw(2.75i) |lw(2.75i) ATTRIBUTE TYPEAT‐
TRIBUTE VALUE _ Availabilitysystem/kernel
SEE ALSO
prctl(1), priocntl(1), priocntl(2), project(5), attributes(7), re‐
source-controls(7), dispadmin(8), psrset(8)
Administering Resource Management in Oracle Solaris 11.4
Oracle Solaris 11.4 14 Jun 2024 FSS(4)