route(4p) 맨 페이지 - 윈디하나의 솔라나라

개요

섹션
맨 페이지 이름
검색(S)

route(4p)

route(4P)                      Network Protocols                     route(4P)



NAME
       route - kernel packet forwarding database

SYNOPSIS
       #include <sys/types.h>
       #include <sys/socket.h>
       #include <net/if.h>
       #include <net/route.h>

       int socket(PF_ROUTE, SOCK_RAW, int protocol);

DESCRIPTION
       UNIX  provides  some  packet routing facilities. The kernel maintains a
       routing information database, which is used in selecting the  appropri‐
       ate network interface when transmitting packets.


       A  user  process (or possibly multiple cooperating processes) maintains
       this database by sending messages over a special kind of  socket.  This
       supplants fixed size ioctl(2)'s specified in routing(4P). Routing table
       changes require the {PRIV_SYS_IP_CONFIG} privilege.


       The operating system  might  spontaneously  emit  routing  messages  in
       response to external events, such as receipt of a re-direct, or failure
       to locate a suitable  route  for  a  request.  The  message  types  are
       described in greater detail below.


       Routing  database  entries  come in two flavors: entries for a specific
       host, or entries for all hosts on a generic subnetwork (as specified by
       a bit mask and value under the mask). The effect of wildcard or default
       route can be achieved by using a mask of all zeros, and  there  can  be
       hierarchical routes.


       When  the  system  is  booted and addresses are assigned to the network
       interfaces, the internet protocol family installs a routing table entry
       for  each interface when it is ready for traffic. Normally the protocol
       specifies the route through each interface as a  direct  connection  to
       the  destination host or network. If the route is direct, the transport
       layer of a protocol family usually requests the packet be sent  to  the
       same  host  specified  in  the  packet.  Otherwise,  the  interface  is
       requested to address the packet to the gateway listed  in  the  routing
       entry, that is, the packet is forwarded.


       When  routing  a  packet, the kernel attempts to find the most specific
       route matching the destination. If no entry is found,  the  destination
       is  declared to be unreachable, and a routing-miss message is generated
       if there are any listeners on the  routing  control  socket  (described
       below).  If there are two different mask and value-under-the-mask pairs
       that match, the more specific is the one with more bits in the mask.  A
       route  to  a  host is regarded as being supplied with a mask of as many
       ones as there are bits in the destination.


       A wildcard routing entry is specified with a zero  destination  address
       value, and a mask of all zeroes. Wildcard routes are used when the sys‐
       tem fails to find other routes matching the destination.  The  combina‐
       tion of wildcard routes and routing redirects can provide an economical
       mechanism for routing traffic.


       One opens the channel for passing routing control messages by using the
       socket call. There can be more than one routing socket open per system.


       Messages  are  formed by a header followed by a small number of sockad‐
       drs, whose length depend on the address family.  sockaddrs  are  inter‐
       preted  by  position.  An  example  of  a  type  of  message with three
       addresses might be a CIDR prefix route: Destination, Netmask, and Gate‐
       way.  The  interpretation  of which addresses are present is given by a
       bit mask within the header, and the sequence is  least  significant  to
       most significant bit within the vector.


       Any  messages  sent  to the kernel are returned, and copies are sent to
       all interested listeners. The kernel provides the  process  ID  of  the
       sender,  and the sender can use an additional sequence field to distin‐
       guish between outstanding messages. However,  message  replies  can  be
       lost when kernel buffers are exhausted.


       The  protocol parameter specifies which messages an application listen‐
       ing on the routing socket is interested in seeing, based on the address
       family of the sockaddrs present. Currently, you can specify AF_INET and
       AF_INET6 to filter the messages seen by the listener, or alternatively,
       you  can  specify AF_UNSPEC to indicate that the listener is interested
       in all routing messages.


       The kernel might reject certain messages, and indicates this by filling
       in the rtm_errno field of the rt_msghdr struct (see below). The follow‐
       ing codes are returned:

       EEXIST     If requested to duplicate an existing entry


       ESRCH      If requested to delete a non-existent entry


       ENOBUFS    If insufficient resources were available to  install  a  new
                  route.


       EPERM      If  the calling process does not have appropriate privileges
                  to alter the routing table.



       In the current implementation, all routing processes run  locally,  and
       the  values for rtm_errno are available through the normal errno mecha‐
       nism, even if the routing reply message is lost.


       A process can avoid the expense of reading replies to its own  messages
       by  issuing  a  setsockopt(3C)  call indicating that the SO_USELOOPBACK
       option at the SOL_SOCKET level is to  be  turned  off.  A  process  can
       ignore  all  messages  from  the routing socket by doing a shutdown(3C)
       system call for further input.


       By default, underlying IP interfaces in an IPMP group are  not  visible
       to  routing  sockets.  As  such,  routing sockets do not receive events
       related to underlying IP interface in an IPMP group.  For  consistency,
       when an IP interface is placed into an IPMP group, RTM_DELADDR messages
       are generated for each IFF_UP address that is not migrated to the  cor‐
       responding IPMP IP interface and an RTM_IFINFO message is sent indicat‐
       ing the interface is down. Similarly, when an underlying  interface  is
       removed  from  an  IPMP group, an RTM_IFINFO message is sent indicating
       the interface is again up and RTM_NEWADDR messages  are  generated  for
       each IFF_UP address found on the interface.


       The RT_AWARE socket option at the SOL_ROUTE level allows an application
       to indicate its awareness of certain features,  which  control  routing
       socket behavior. The supported values are:

       RTAW_DEFAULT        Default awareness.


       RTAW_UNDER_IPMP     IPMP  underlying interface awareness. When enabled,
                           underlying IP interfaces in an  IPMP  group  remain
                           visible to the routing socket and events related to
                           them continue to be generated.



       An RTM_ADD request tied to an underlying IP interface in an IPMP  group
       is  translated  to  an  RTM_ADD  request  for its corresponding IPMP IP
       interface. All routing socket requests other than RTM_ADD  and  RTM_GET
       fail when issued on an underlying IP interface in an IPMP group.


       If  a  route  is in use when it is deleted, the routing entry is marked
       down and removed from the routing table, but the  resources  associated
       with it are not reclaimed until all references to it are released.


       The  RTM_IFINFO,  RTM_NEWADDR,  and  RTM_ADD  messages  associated with
       interface configuration (setting the IFF_UP bit) are  normally  delayed
       until  after  Duplicate Address Detection completes. Thus, applications
       that configure interfaces and wish to wait until the interface is ready
       can  wait  until  RTM_IFINFO  is  returned and SIOCGLIFFLAGS shows that
       IFF_DUPLICATE is not set.

   Messages
       User processes can obtain information about the routing entry to a spe‐
       cific destination by using a RTM_GET message.


       Messages include:

         #define RTM_ADD      0x1   /* Add Route */
         #define RTM_DELETE   0x2   /* Delete Route */
         #define RTM_CHANGE   0x3   /* Change Metrics, Flags, or Gateway */
         #define RTM_GET      0x4   /* Report Information */
         #define RTM_LOSING   0x5   /* Kernel Suspects Partitioning */
         #define RTM_REDIRECT 0x6   /* Told to use different route */
         #define RTM_MISS     0x7   /* Lookup failed on this address */
         #define RTM_LOCK     0x8   /* fix specified metrics */
         #define RTM_OLDADD   0x9   /* caused by SIOCADDRT */
         #define RTM_OLDDEL   0xa   /* caused by SIOCDELRT */
         #define RTM_RESOLVE  0xb   /* request to resolve dst to LL addr */
         #define RTM_NEWADDR  0xc   /* address being added to iface */
         #define RTM_DELADDR  0xd   /* address being removed from iface */
         #define RTM_IFINFO   0xe   /* iface going up/down etc. */



       A message header consists of:

         struct rt_msghdr {
           ushort_t rtm_msglen;    /* to skip over non-understood messages */
           uchar_t  rtm_version;   /* future binary compatibility */
           uchar_t  rtm_type;      /* message type */
           ushort_t rtm_index;     /* index for associated ifp */
           pid_t   rtm_pid;        /* identify sender */
           int     rtm_addrs;      /* bitmask identifying sockaddrs in msg */
           int     rtm_seq;        /* for sender to identify action */
           int     rtm_errno;      /* why failed */
           int     rtm_flags;      /*  flags,  incl  kern  &  message, e.g., DONE */
           int     rtm_use;        /* from rtentry */
           uint_t  rtm_inits;      /* which values we are initializing */

         struct  rt_metrics rtm_rmx;   /* metrics themselves */
              };






       where



         struct rt_metrics {
           uint32_t rmx_locks;      /* Kernel must leave  these  values alone */
           uint32_t rmx_mtu;        /* MTU for this path */
           uint32_t rmx_hopcount;   /* max hops expected */
           uint32_t rmx_expire;     /* lifetime for route, e.g., redirect */
           uint32_t rmx_recvpipe;   /* inbound delay-bandwidth  product */
           uint32_t rmx_sendpipe;   /* outbound delay-bandwidth product */
           uint32_t rmx_ssthresh;   /* outbound gateway buffer limit */
           uint32_t rmx_rtt;        /* estimated round trip time */
           uint32_t rmx_rttvar;     /* estimated rtt variance */
           uint32_t rmx_pksent;     /* packets sent using this route */
          };

         /* Flags include the values */


         #define RTF_UP         0x1     /* route usable */
         #define RTF_GATEWAY    0x2     /* destination is a gateway */
         #define RTF_HOST       0x4     /* host entry (net otherwise) */
         #define RTF_REJECT     0x8     /* host or net unreachable */
         #define RTF_DYNAMIC    0x10    /* created dynamically(by redirect) */
         #define RTF_MODIFIED   0x20    /* modified dynamically(by redirect) */
         #define RTF_DONE       0x40    /* message confirmed */
         #define RTF_MASK       0x80    /* subnet mask present */
         #define RTF_CLONING    0x100   /* generate new routes on use */
         #define RTF_XRESOLVE   0x200   /* external daemon resolves name */
         #define RTF_LLINFO     0x400   /* generated by ARP */
         #define RTF_STATIC     0x800   /* manually added */
         #define RTF_BLACKHOLE  0x1000  /* just discard pkts (during updates) */
         #define RTF_PRIVATE    0x2000  /* do not advertise this route */
         #define RTF_PROTO2     0x4000  /* protocol specific routing flag #2 */
         #define RTF_PROTO1     0x8000  /* protocol specific routing flag #1 */
         #define RTF_MULTIRT    0x10000 /* multiroute */
         #define RTF_SETSRC     0x20000 /* set default outgoing src address */
         #define RTF_INDIRECT   0x40000 /* gateway not directly reachable */
         #define RTF_KERNEL     0x80000 /* created by kernel; can't delete */

         /* Specifiers for metric values in rmx_locks and rtm_inits are */

         #define RTV_MTU        0x1     /* init or lock _mtu */
         #define RTV_HOPCOUNT   0x2     /* init or lock _hopcount */
         #define RTV_EXPIRE     0x4     /* init or lock _expire */
         #define RTV_RPIPE      0x8     /* init or lock _recvpipe */
         #define RTV_SPIPE      0x10    /* init or lock _sendpipe */
         #define RTV_SSTHRESH   0x20    /* init or lock _ssthresh */
         #define RTV_RTT        0x40    /* init or lock _rtt */
         #define RTV_RTTVAR     0x80    /* init or lock _rttvar */

         /* Specifiers for which addresses are present in  the  messages are */

         #define RTA_DST        0x1     /* destination sockaddr present */
         #define RTA_GATEWAY    0x2     /* gateway sockaddr present */
         #define RTA_NETMASK    0x4     /* netmask sockaddr present */
         #define RTA_GENMASK    0x8     /* cloning mask sockaddr present */
         #define RTA_IFP        0x10    /* interface name sockaddr present */
         #define RTA_IFA        0x20    /* interface addr sockaddr present */
         #define RTA_AUTHOR     0x40    /* sockaddr for author of redirect */
         #define RTA_BRD        0x80    /* for NEWADDR, broadcast or p-p dest addr */




SEE ALSO
       ioctl(2), setsockopt(3C), shutdown(3C), routing(4P), privileges(7)

NOTES
       Some  of  the  metrics  might  not  be implemented and return zero. The
       implemented metrics are set in rtm_inits.


       The RTF_INDIRECT flag allows adding routes where  the  gateway  is  not
       directly  reachable.  When  an  indirect  route is the best match for a
       packet to be sent or forwarded, then IP proceeds to lookup that gateway
       to  find  a route that is directly reachable. The RTF_INDIRECT flag can
       be used even if the gateway is directly reachable.


       When the routing table contains several equal routes, that  is,  routes
       for the same destination and mask, then IP attempts to spread the traf‐
       fic over those routes. The spreading is such that an individual  trans‐
       port  connection uses the same route to avoid packet reordering as seen
       by e.g., TCP. The details of the spreading algorithm is not  documented
       and is likely to evolve over time.



Oracle Solaris 11.4               3 Nov 2021                         route(4P)
맨 페이지 내용의 저작권은 맨 페이지 작성자에게 있습니다.
RSS ATOM XHTML 5 CSS3